Thursday, June 12, 2008
Has Global Warming Research Misinterpreted Cloud Behavior?
Read More
Is it already too late to stop climate change catastrophe?
by Patrick Metzger
Jun 12th 2008 @ 1:31PM
Filed under: News, Climate Change
Scientists at a conference in Canberra, Australia are saying that climate change is happening much faster, and likely to have much more dire consequences, than anyone imagined possible a year or two ago. What's more, we may have already passed the point of no return.
Climate change expert Barry Brook, a professor at Adelaide University, said that based on the volume of greenhouse gases being dumped into the atmosphere he expected an average 6 degree Celsius jump in worldwide temperatures. To put that into perspective, a 3 degree increase could wipe out the Amazon rain forest, and 5 degrees would mean an ice-free planet and a sea-level rises of 80 metres (260 feet).
Another researcher, Barrie Pittock, noted that CO2 emissions had already surpassed the worst-case scenario in Iast year's report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and that the effects of climate change were occuring far more rapidly as a result.
Even more frightening, conference participants noted that feedback mechanisms would cause temperature increases to snowball, so to speak, even if carbon emissions were successfully reduced. The nature of these mechanisms means that once we reach certain "tipping points", there will be no way to prevent disaster. How close we are to these tipping points is uncertain, but Professor Brook observed that "We're seeing events predicted for the end of the 21st century happening already."
Data Breach Study Spanning 500 Break-Ins Released
from the did-you-update-the-windows dept.
UK Can Now Hold People Without Charge For 42 Days
from the the-terrorists-have-won dept.
Toyota to introduce plug-in hybrid for 2010, hybrid versions of all cars by 2029
by Joshua Fruhlinger, posted Jun 11th 2008 at 10:56PM
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
Misplaced wings no sweat for DARPA's new aircraft control system
by Joshua Fruhlinger, posted Jun 12th 2008 at 12:56AM
[Thanks, jr]
RIAA Throws In Towel On "Making Available" Case
from the that's-sure-a-big-towel-you've-got dept.
Cancer-killing Viruses Influence Tumor Blood-vessel Growth
ScienceDaily (Jun. 11, 2008) — Viruses genetically designed to kill cancer cells offer a promising strategy for treating incurable brain tumors such as glioblastoma, but the body's natural defenses often eliminate the viruses before they can eliminate the tumor.
Read More
Who Shalt Not Kill? Brain Power Leads To Level-headedness When Faced With Moral Dilemmas
Read More
Study Finds Instant Messaging Helps Productivity
from the you-gotta-be-kidding-me dept.
Tuesday, June 10, 2008
(This was a longer but interesting article) Is a green lifestyle just the new survivalism?
by Patrick Metzger
Jun 10th 2008 @ 2:00PM
Filed under: Polit-eco, Climate Change, Read this because it's really important
In pre-industrial times, everybody was a survivalist. The supply chain for your food was from your front door to your field, and if your house fell down in a hurricane, there was nobody to drive you to a gymnasium and stuff your backpack with t-shirts and fish sticks. If you got sick, you died or you didn't.
However, as we've come to rely more and more on the intricate machinery of a mechanized world to keep ourselves alive, there have been those who worried about what would happen if the whole thing fell apart.
In the 1950's, with nuclear Armageddon looming, some wondered if ducking and covering would really be adequate protection against several mega-tonnes of high-powered Russian technology. Sales of easy-to-install home fallout shelters boomed, along with freeze dried foods and other accoutrements of civilized living necessary for a couple of years spent keeping the mutant hordes at bay from behind 5 feet of steel and concrete.
As cold war tensions eased, people thought less about nuclear war, but the disintegration of industrial society remained a concern for some. The 70's saw the first use of the term "survivalist", often in reference to well-armed eccentrics with unconventional views on race relations holed up in the countryside somewhere.
While the survivalist trend waxed and waned with energy crises and predicted ice ages, and made a limited comeback during the Y2K scare, it never recovered the mainstream appeal it had achieved in the first couple of post-war decades.
But that may be changing.
The current movement to save the planet, or more accurately to save ourselves, has a couple of different components. High-glam, high tech is one part. These are big budget, big picture projects - giant wind farms, networks of hydrogen fueling stations, massive new buildings that generate their own power . Most of these are in concept or planning stages and a few have actually been built, but the common denominator is they cost a lot of money and a lot of fossil-fuel energy to build, both of which are in increasingly short supply.
Trotting alongside the mega-projects are our individual efforts like recycling garbage, turning down the a/c, driving slower etc; simple things that we can each do to lessen our impact on the environment. We can call this "feel-good" stuff, because while it doesn't hurt, incremental actions like riding a bike once a week won't pull us out of the global warming frying pan. Besides, half the planet's population is living a low-carbon lifestyle already, and for the most part desperately trying to escape it.
But there's a more disquieting element to the personal green battle. That's the piece that speaks to the voice whispering in the back of every eco-enthusiast's head :"What if we don't get it together? What if things do come apart?"
And there are plenty of people ready to answer those questions.
Green websites are chock-a-block with useful advice on how to grow your own food, collect rainwater, and install enough mini-solar and wind power to keep the homestead running in the event of blackouts. What farm animals can I raise in my yard? Can I grow tomatoes in a window box? What's the best kind of composting toilet?
It's not called survivalism any more, because that terminology has unpleasant associations, but it amounts to the same thing. How do I take care of me and mine, once government and society have collapsed from the twin threats of climate change and resource depletion?
The ongoing shift from "how do we save the planet" to "how do I save myself" is subtle, because no one wants to be the the first one in the neighbourhood to go all Chicken Little. Still, as the media drumbeat of impending cataclysm sounds louder, it's not surprising that more people are looking for a personal backup plan. Not that we're survivalists, you understand, that's so...crazy. But no harm in keeping a little garden in the yard, and maybe throwing some solar panels on the barn up at Uncle Harry's farm.
There's nothing wrong with all this, practically speaking - anything we do to make our footprint lighter helps. But it's important that we not lose sight of the bigger picture, which is that if we abandon the effort to act collectively and yes, politically, we doom ourselves. 7 billion people simply can't go back to the land - we've domesticated ourselves to the point where without some form of the complex infrastructure we've built, most of us will disappear.
Luckily there are solutions. In the UK and increasingly elsewhere, citizens are planning "transition towns", communities which would be largely self-sufficient but don't subscribe to the "every person for themself" ethos of the survivalist. Urban farming collectives are popping up in cities around the world. People are helping each other. And at a national and international level, leaders who don't see the importance of a shift to sustainability are being marginalized.
So haul your ass out of that bunker, buddy. We've got work to do.
Relics of Science History For Sale At Christie's
from the shroud-of-einstein-doesn't-have-the-same-ring dept.
Efficiency? Think Racing Cars, Not Hybrids
from the more-fun-that-way-too dept.
Having Heart Surgery? Watch Your Blood Sugar, Especially If You're Overweight Or Older
Read More
Morningness Is A Predictor Of Better Grades In College
Read More
Lutz gets behind the wheel of a Volt test vehicle
by Josh Loposer
Jun 10th 2008 @ 8:30AM
Filed under: Cars and Transportation, GreenTech
The Volt is slated to hit the lots by November 2010, and according to Lutz, development is going surprisingly smoothly. Apparently, battery performance is exceeding expectations and GM is getting closer to deciding which battery maker will get the Volt contract.
On his cruise, the fully charged Volt ran at speed of up to 75-80 mph for 20 miles without the gas engine ever turning on to recharge the Li-ion battery. Lutz also mentioned that piloting the Volt had a eerily quality, saying "our electric motors and drive system are deathly silent, there's no whine or whirring noise from the electric motor."
[via AutoBlogGreen]
Want to know how much your next road trip will drain from your wallet?
Paper Stronger Than Cast Iron
from the write-on dept.
The SUV Is Dethroned
from the four-dollar-stake-through-the-engine dept.
Study Hints At Time Before Big Bang
from the other-side-of-the-looking-glass dept.
Monday, June 9, 2008
Antibiotics Can Prevent Wound Complications Of Childbirth, Study Shows
Read More
Giant Telescope Mirrors For The Moon Could Be Made With Carbon, Epoxy And Lunar Dust
Read More
Scientists Surprised to Find Earth's Biosphere Booming
from the but-there's-also-the-slow-hiss-in-the-background dept.
Lower Crop Yields Due To Ozone A Factor In World Food Crisis
Read More
Sheep's Sex Determined By Diet Prior To Pregnancy
Read More
High oil prices soon to hit consumer wallets harder
by Patrick Metzger
Jun 8th 2008 @ 4:15PM
Filed under: News, Polit-eco
The New York Times reports that record high prices for oil, which thus far haven't had much of an inflationary impact, will soon be hitting consumers where it hurts.
With the obvious exception of gasoline, Joe and Jane Sixpack been relatively shielded from the massive run-up in oil prices, as manufacturers and distributors absorb the increases by cutting profit margins. However, with profits of American businesses already dropping 6% in the last year, Friday's record high oil price of $138.54 may be the straw that breaks the camel's back in terms of forcing business to hike prices if they want to stay in the black.
In addition to transportation costs, businesses are facing rising prices for products derived from oil and petrochemicals, meaning everything from plastics and synthetic rubber to fertilizers used in agriculture. For example, Dow Chemical, which turns oil and gas into the materials to make plastic, last month raised prices by an unprecedented 20% across the board. That jump will be passed along to thousands of downstream businesses and ultimately to end users.
In the greater scheme of things, higher oil and petrochemical costs can be expected to have all kinds of environmental and societal benefits. Companies will use less packaging in their products, recycling will become cheaper than buying new, and cutting waste will become mission number one in industries of all types. in the short term however, with jobs disappearing, home foreclosures skyrocketing, and driving becoming an expensive luxury, inflation on everything from soap to soup to sandals is likely make things tough for a lot of people.